It’s all very confusing!
The last week of a calendar year is traditionally reserved for a look back in a kind of “whither have we drifted” analysis. The first week of the new year is reserved for a look forward in a kind of “where are we going” analysis.
If we consider events since the Real Plan we might conclude that at some point Brazil stepped behind the looking glass and into a “back-to-front” world.
The Real Plan, in fact, set Brazil on its head. Ever since colonial times, Brazil had been governed by strong central government, concentrated initially in the monarchy and, after independence, in the emperor. While the titles had changed, the same family was in charge of Brazil from discovery in 1500 to the proclamation of a republic in 1889 followed by the exile of the emperor. A lot happened in the world during those 389 years since Portugal first arrived to Brazil. Brazil, however, was kept pretty much in the dark about what was going on elsewhere in the world.
While Spanish America had established universities in the 16th through the 18thcenturies, Brazil did not establish universities until the dawn of the 19thcentury.
News of Brazil in Portugal was restricted and news of Europe in Brazil virtually prohibited. Private libraries were outlawed. The original geographic division of the country was in the form of 15 hereditary land grants to selected Portuguese nobles (or quasi-nobles) who were the “attorneys-in-fact” of the monarch.
The First Republic was announced over a century after the Enlightenment had brought down monarchical Absolutism in Europe.
It’s not surprising that what followed in Brazil was a rush to catch up to the rest of the world. Strong central government continued as Brazil sought to develop and industrialize and fiscal imbalance was the general rule. Inflation was a constant problem and the Brazilian economy lurched between “boom” and “bust” in response to commodity price cycles while the political environment alternated between populist dictatorship and (ungoverned) democracy.
Throughout, inflation confiscated asset values in favor of a small governing elite, impeding the development of a middle class (a la Adam Smith). Attempts to change this situation were only partially successful. It was only in the mid-90s, after a traumatic period of hyperinflation that Brazil brought the “confiscatory tax” of inflation under control with the Real Plan. By this time, Brazil had been governed for just short of 500 years by “kleptocracy”.
Enter the PT.
It is ironic that the PT that began as a party to reform of (to quote Lula) “everything that is ‘out there’”, once in power grew into a new class of “kleptocrats”. It almost immediately set out to restructure government to ensure control over the Brazilian state. It “defanged” regulatory agencies created by the Real Plan while pretending to accept the governance precepts of the plan. While promising to follow through on required infrastructure development to accommodate a “new middle class” of 40-million individuals (20% of the total population) it concentrated its efforts on populist measures and crony politics to ensure its hold on power.
This met with the resistance of Brazil's “traditional” class of kleptocrats and a struggle for predominance ensued. I labelled this the “War of the Kleptocrats” in this blog. The “war” is between “traditional” and “neo” kleptocrats over control of the process for confiscating the economic rents of Brazil.
The “war” eventually left the 40-million new middle class to its own devices and as a group to be manipulated by both sides, neither of which is interested in moving Brazil from the status of a rich country to that of a rich nation.
The rules of governance have been set aside by both sides and the only institution that seeks to impose the rules is the Judiciary.
As one would expect, the “war” has moved from simple political maneuvering to outright conflict and political “thuggery”. The 40-million are gradually losing their collective grip over their new-found prosperity. Inflation, on the upswing, has reduced their wealth and threatened their expectations for the future. Job loss was added to the “misery equation” as Brazil stepped behind the looking glass where everything is back-to-front, logic has been turned upside down, and the future looks increasingly like the past.
For example, the contribution of industry to Brazil’s GDP is now lower than it was in 1950 – 65 years ago! The only way to show progress is to turn upside down the line and bar graphs of key economic indicators.
While the administration promises prosperity and growth, the “numbers” go the other way.
In this back-to-front world the logic is that (as the Red Queen told Alice) “In order to stay in place you must run as fast as you can. To get somewhere, you must run faster than that!”
The clock runs backward and the statements of the administration must be understood as the opposite of what is being said or promised. “Development” means “undevelopment”, “growth” means “shrinking”, and “prosperity” means “poverty”. You have only to look back at the evolution of the numbers and the rules of governance over the past 13 years! Whether by accident or design, that is the way it has worked out.
So, once the “retrospect” phase has ended, we will come to the “outlook” phase for 2016.
Analysts suggest that the “war” is likely to continue into next year with much the same result as we have so far observed.
So, on New Year’s Eve you should be prepared to “ring out the new and ring in the old” as required by the inverted logic of the world behind the looking glass.
Sorry!